ANTHROPOGENIC INFLUENCE ON ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY OF LIGHT-GREY FORESTAL SURFACE-GLEYED SOIL

Authors

  • Tetiana PARTYKA Institute of Agriculture of Carpathian Region of NAAS Author
  • Yurii OLIFIR Institute of Agriculture of Carpathian Region of NAAS Author
  • Anna HABRYEL Institute of Agriculture of Carpathian Region of NAAS Author
  • Oleh HAVRYSHKO Institute of Agriculture of Carpathian Region of NAAS Author
  • Nadiia KOZAK Institute of Agriculture of Carpathian Region of NAAS Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32636/agroscience.2022-(1)-4-4

Keywords:

soil microbiocenosis, biological activity, enzymatic activity, fertilizers, fertility

Abstract

The critical shortage of rainfall along with the higher average temperatures during the growth and development of spring barley and corn has significantly affected the soil biological activity, in particular, the decomposition of linen was significantly slowed. Studies have shown that the lowest values of the general biological activity of light-grey forestal surface-gleyed soil under spring barley and corn on grain were obtained on the control version without fertilizers – 15.65 ± 1.93 and 30.47 ± 8.05 % respectively. Organo-mineral fertilizers provided the highest decomposition of linen cloths – 31.70 ± 4.58 % in soil under barley and 63.33 ± 2.43 % under corn. Light-grey forestal surface-gleyed soil is characterized as very poor on the scale of soil supply by enzymes. The highest catalase activity is marked with the introduction of 15 t/ha of manure + 0.5 n NPK+ 1.5 n CaCO3 by Nh – 0.65 ml of 0.1 n KMNO4 /g of soil for 20 min under spring barley, that is associated with a favourable pH value (5.68). The highest activity for corn was shown in version 17 with mineral fertilizer N105Р101К101 and liming 1.5 n СаСО3 by Nh – 0.85 ml

References

Antypchuk A. F., Pilyashenko-Novokhatny A. I., Evdokymenko T. M. (2011). Manual on microbiology: a textbook. Kyiv: Ukraine University. 155 p.

Bhaduri D., Sihi D., Bhowmik A., Verma B. C., Munda S., Dari B. (2022). A review on effective soil health bio-indicators for ecosystem restoration and sustainability. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.938481

Bradford M. A., Wieder W. R., Bonan G. B., Fierer N., Raymond P. A., Crowther T. W. (2016). Managing uncertainty in soil carbon feedbacks to climate change. Nature Climate Change 6, 751–758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3071

Breza-Boruta B., Lemanowicz J., Bartkowiak A. (2016). Variation in biological and physicochemical parameters of the soil affected by uncontrolled landfill sites. Environ Earth Sci, 75 (75) : 201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4955-9

Bueis T., Turrión M. B., Bravo F. et al. (2018). Factors determining enzyme activities in soils under Pinus halepensis and Pinus sylvestris plantations in Spain: a basis for establishing sustainable forest management strategies. Annals of Forest Science, 75, 34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-018-0720-z

Demyanyuk O. S. (2017). Ecological bases of functioning of microbiocenoses of soil of agroecosystems in conditions of climate change: diss. ... Dr. agr. sciences: 03.00.16. Kyiv, 439 p. [Online] Available at: https://agroeco.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/pdf/dissertation/ecology/demianiyk/dis_demianijuk.pdf [Accessed 30 December 2022].

Furtak K., Gałązka A. (2019). Enzymatic activity as a popular parameter used to determine the quality of the soil environment. Polish Journal of Agronomy. 37, 22–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26114/pja.iung.385.2019.37.04

IIheme C., Ukairo D. I., Ibegbulem C. O., Okorom O. O., Chibundu K. (2017). Analysis of Enzymes Activities on Domestic Waste Dump Sites. J Bioremediat Biodegrad, 8: 400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6199.1000400

Joniec J. (2018). Enzymatic activity as an indicator of regeneration processes in degraded soil reclaimed with various types of waste. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 15, 2241–2252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1602-x

Lee S.-H., Kim M.-S., Kim J.-G., Kim S.-O. (2020). Use of Soil Enzymes as Indicators for Contaminated Soil Monitoring and Sustainable Management. Sustainability, 12 (19), 8209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198209

Liang C. (2020). Soil microbial carbon pump: Mechanism and appraisal. Soil Ecol. Lett. 2, 241–254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42832-020-0052-4

Liang C., Schimel J. P., Jastrow J. D. (2017). The importance of anabolism in microbial control over soil carbon storage. Nature microbiology, 2, 17105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.105

Maphuhla N. G., Lewu F. B., Oyedeji O. O. (2020). The Effects of Physicochemical Parameters on Analysed Soil Enzyme Activity from Alice Landfill Site. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18 (1) : 221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph1801022

Sherstoboeva O. V., Demyanyuk O. S. (2015). The role of microbial component of soil in the issue of greenhouse gases. Materials of the All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference "Soils Protection and Increasing their Fertility" (Odesa, September 16-17, 2015). pp. 126–127.

Ying Tian, Zhe Xu, Jun Wang, Zhanjun Wang. (2022). Evaluation of Soil Quality for Different Types of Land Use Based on Minimum Dataset in the Typical Desert Steppe in Ningxia, China. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2022, 7506189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7506189

Published

30.12.2022 — Updated on 30.12.2022

Issue

Section

Plant Science

How to Cite

Tetiana PARTYKA, Yurii OLIFIR, Anna HABRYEL, Oleh HAVRYSHKO, & Nadiia KOZAK. (2022). ANTHROPOGENIC INFLUENCE ON ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY OF LIGHT-GREY FORESTAL SURFACE-GLEYED SOIL. AGROSCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 1(4), 28-33. https://doi.org/10.32636/agroscience.2022-(1)-4-4

Similar Articles

1-10 of 59

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.