NITROGEN PRODUCTION ACTIVITY OF THE RUMEN MICROBIOTA IN LACTATING EWES AFTER USE OF ADDITIVE PROBIOTIC ENZYMACTYV IN FEEDING DIET

Authors

  • Stakh VOVK Institute of Agriculture of Carpathian Region of NAAS Author
  • Hryhorii SEDILO Institute of Agriculture of Carpathian Region of NAAS Author
  • Myron PETRYSHYN Institute of Agriculture of Carpathian Region of NAAS Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32636/agroscience.2022-(1)-4-6

Keywords:

lactating ewes, probiotics, feeding, ruminal metabolism, animal productivity

Abstract

The article presents the results of experimental studies on the dose-dependent effect of the use of domestically produced probiotic Enzymactiv (EA), made on the basis of bread baker yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the diet of lactating ewes on the production of nitrogenous compounds by the symbiotic microflora of the rumen and the productive qualities of animals. It was established that the introduction of EA probiotic supplements to the combined feed of ewes in doses of 0.4; 0.8 and 1.2% of its mass increases the level of total, residual and protein nitrogen in the ruminal fluid by 0.8-11.1%; 0.1-10.2% and 0.1-16.9% respectively, compared to animals that did not receive bio-additives in the diet. The use of prebiotic EA in the such amounts in the diet of ewes increases the average daily weight gain of lambs by 1.0-9.4% during the period from birth to weaning, and increases wool shearing in ewes by 0.5-2.0% compared to animals of control group. Based on the stimulating effect on the nitrogen-producing activity of the rumen microbiota and the productive qualities of the animals, the most optimal dose of the Enzymactive probiotic for compound feed of lactating ewes is 0.8% of its weight

References

Ahlam R. A. (2011). Utilization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation for feeding goats in South Sinai. Egypt J. Nutr. Feeds.14,169-181.

Bakowski M., Kiczorowska B. (2021). Probiotic microorganisms and herbs in ruminant nutrition as natural modurators of health and production efficiency – A rewiew. Ann. Anim. Sci. 21, 3-28, https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2020-0081.

Comert M., Şayan Y., Özelçam H., Baykal G. Y. (2015). Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation and anhydrous ammonia treatment of wheat straw on in situ degradability and rumen fermentation and growth performance of yearling lambs. Asian-Austral J. Anim Sci. 28(5),639-646. doi: 10.5713/ajas.14.0757.

Dekker J., Ukraintsev S. (2012). Probiotics revisited: new strains, new benefits, new opportunities. Pediatric pharmacology. 9(2), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.15690/pf.v9i2.243.

Desnoyers M., Giger-Reverdin S., Bertin G., Duvaux-Ponter C., Sauvant D. (2009). Meta-analysis of the influence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on ruminal parameters and milk production of ruminants. J. Dairy Sci. 92, 1620-1632. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1414..

Estrada-Angulo A., Zapata-Ramirez O., Castro-Perez B.I. (2021). The effets of single or combined supplementation of probiotics and prebiotics on growth performance, dietary energetics, carcass traits, and visceral mass in lambs finished under subtropical climate conditions. Biology. 10, 2-13, https://doi.org/10.3390/biology101111137.

Fadel A.M., Abusamra A. (2007). Effect of supplemental yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) culture on NDF digestibility and rumen fermentation of forage sorghum hay in Nubian goat’s kids. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 3(3),133-137.

Guedes C.M., Goncalves D., Rodrigues M. A., Dias A. (2008). Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast on ruminal fermentation and fiber degradation of maize silages in cows. J. Anim. Feed Sci. Techn. 145, 27-40. DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.06.037.

Kamal R., Dutt T., Singh M., Nandan D., Patel M., Choudhary L. (2013). Effect of live Saccharomyces cerevisiae (NCDC-49) supplementation on growth performance and rumen fermentation pattern in local goat. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 41(3),285-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2013.782865.

Kowalik B., Skomial J., Pajak J. J., Taciak M., Majewska M., Belzecki G. (2012). Population of ciliates. rumen fermentation indicators and biochemical parameters of blood serum in heifers fed diets supplemented with yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) preparation. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep.30(4),329–338.

Lascano G. J., Zanton G. I., Heinrichs A. J. (2009). Concentrate levels and Saccharomyces cerevisiae affect rumen fluidassociated bacteria numbers in dairy heifer's. J. Livestock Sci. Dec.126(1-3):189-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.06.019.

Markowiak P., Slizewska K. (2018). The role of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiottics in animal nutrition. Gut pathogenes. 10, 2-20, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-018-0250-0. 2018/Gutpathog.2018.06.006.

Michalak M., Wojnarowski K., Cholewinska P., Szeligowska N., Bawej M., Pagon J. (2021). Selected Alternative Feed Additives Used to Manipulate the Rumen Microbiome. Animals. 11, 1542-1552, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061542/animals.2021.05.025

Moharrery E., Asadi A. (2009). Effects of supplementing malate and yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on the rumen enzyme profile and growth performance of Lambs. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 18(2),283-295. DOI: https:// doi.org /10.22358/jafs/66393/2009.

Ogbuewu I. P., Okoro V. M., Mbajiorgu E. F., Mbajiorgu C. A. (2018).Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and its effect on production indices of livestock and poultry - a review. Comp. Clin. Pathol. 28, 669-677. DOI: 10.1007/s00580-018-2862-7.

Ozsoy B., Yalcin S., Erodogan Z., Cantekin Z., Aksui T. (2013). Effects of dietary live yeast culture on fattening performance on some blood and rumen fluid parameters in goats. Rev. Veter. . Med. 164(5):263-271.

Pienaar G. H., Einkamer O. B., Merwe J., Hugo A., Scholtz G. D., Fair M. D. (2012).The effects of an active live yeast product on the growth performance of finishing lambs. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 42(15),464-468. DOI: 10.4314/sajas.v42i5.4.

Robinson P. H., Erasmus L. J. (2009). Effects of analyzable diet components on responses of lactating dairy cows to Saccharomyces cerevisiae based yeast products: A systematic review of the literature. Anim.Feed Sci.Tech. 149(3–4),185–198. DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2008.10.003.

Sundus F. M., Firas A. M., Enas R. A. (2018). A review on effects of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additives in ruminants performance. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 6(2), 629-635.

Vlizlo V.V., Fedoruk R.S.,Ratych I.B. et al. (2012). Laboratory research methods in biology, animal husbandry and veterinary medicine. Lviv. Spolom 764 p.

(in Ukrainian).

Vovk S., Dmitrotsa A., Polovyi I., Buchynskyi V. (2021). Probiotic in animal and poultry feeding. Foothill and Mountain Agriculture and Stock Breeding.69(1),157–168. (In Ukrainian). DOI: 10.32636/01308521.2021-(69)-10

Published

30.12.2022

Issue

Section

Stockbreeding

How to Cite

Stakh VOVK, Hryhorii SEDILO, & Myron PETRYSHYN. (2022). NITROGEN PRODUCTION ACTIVITY OF THE RUMEN MICROBIOTA IN LACTATING EWES AFTER USE OF ADDITIVE PROBIOTIC ENZYMACTYV IN FEEDING DIET. AGROSCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 1(4), 39-44. https://doi.org/10.32636/agroscience.2022-(1)-4-6

Similar Articles

1-10 of 73

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>