The influence of growing season conditions, sowing date, and preceding crop on the flour strength formation in Triticum aestivum L. genotypes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32636/01308521.2023-(74)-2-3Keywords:
winter bread wheat, flour strength, hydrothermal regime, anthropogenic factors, variability, ANOVAAbstract
As a result of experimental studies, the peculiarities of the formation of flour strength of Triticum aestivum L. varieties and breeding lines depending on the hydrothermal conditions of the year, the sowing date, and the preceding crop were revealed. There were evaluated 14 varieties and three breeding lines of winter bread wheat, which were sown during three years for three sowing dates after five preceding crops under conditions of the V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat, NAAS of Ukraine.
The years with the most and the least variation in flour strength were identified. On average, according to sowing dates, preceding crops, varieties and breeding lines, the highest (375 a. un.) value of this indicator was obtained in 2016‒2017, the lowest one (202 a. un.) was obtained in 2018‒2019. The determining influence of growing season conditions (41.3 %) and significant influence of genotype (21.3 %) on the flour strength of winter bread wheat was revealed. No significant influence of sowing date and preceding crop on the formation of this indicator was found.
The most stable genotypes were singled out in terms of the influence of the sowing date after various preceding crops. The varieties Balada myronivska, Vezha myronivska, Estafeta myronivska, MIP Assol, MIP Valensiia, MIP Vyshyvanka, MIP Kniazhna, MIP Lada and breeding lines L. 37519, L. 55198 were identified, which reliably exceeded the Podolianka standard in terms of flour strength.
Therefore, the mentioned varieties and breeding lines of winter bread wheat should be used in the breeding process as sources for improving grain quality. The revealed peculiarities of the flour strength formation in winter bread wheat genotypes depending on preceding crops, sowing dates in the years of the study should be taken into account when developing the basic elements of cropping practices for the varieties.
References
1. Діордієва І. П., Масловата С. А. Технологічні та хлібопекарські властивості зерна форм пшениці створених за гібридизації Triticum aestivum L. × Triticum spelta L. Наукові доповіді НУБіП України. 2023. № 2/102. DOI: 10.31548/dopovidi2(102).2023.004.
2. Криворучко Л. М., Тищенко В. М., Макаова Б. Є. Вплив стресових умов середовища на формування показників якості зерна сортів пшениці озимої селекції Полтавського державного аграрного університету. Вісник Полтавської державної аграрної академії. 2022. № 3. С. 26–30. DOI: 10.31210/visnyk2022.03.03.
3. Марковська О. Є., Гречишкіна Т. А. Якість зерна сортів пшениці озимої залежно від удобрення та захисту рослин від хвороб в умовах Південного Степу України. Таврійський науковий вісник. 2020. № 114. С. 77–84. DOI: 10.32851/2226-0099.2020.114.11.
4. Назаренко В. О., Юдічева О. П., Жук В. А. Формування якості товарів : навчальний посібник. Частина 1. Київ : Центр учбової літератури, 2012. 386 с.
5. Правдзіва І. В. Хлібопекарські властивості борошна пшениці м’якої озимої залежно від агротехнічних заходів вирощування в центральному Лісостепу. Передгірне та гірське землеробство і тваринництво. 2022. Вип. 71 (1). С. 141–159. DOI: 10.32636/01308521.2022-(71)-1-9.
6. Технологічна оцінка рослинницької продукції сортів сільськогосподарських видів. Методика державної науково-технічної експертизи сортів рослин. Методи визначення показників якості продукції рослинництва / за ред. С. О. Ткачик, 4-те вид. Вінниця : ТОВ «Нілан-ЛТД», 2015. C. 6–64.
7. Технологія виробництва насіння пшениці озимої / за ред. А. А. Сіроштана, В. П. Кавунця. Київ : Компринт, 2016. 92 с.
8. Харчові технології / С. В. Мерзлов та ін. Біла Церква, 2016. 450 с.
9. A comparative assessment of agronomic and baking qualities of modern/old varieties and landraces of wheat grown in Calabria (Italy) / G. Preiti et al. Foods. 2022. Vol. 11 (15): 2359. DOI: 10.3390/foods11152359.
10. Agrawal D. K., Nath S. Effect of climatic factor and date of sowing on wheat crop in Allahabad condition, Uttar Pradesh. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2018. Vol. 7, Iss. 9. P. 1776–1782. DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.709.214.
11. Dominance of Bacillus species in the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) rhizosphere and their plant growth promoting potential under salt stress conditions / S. T. Zahra et al. Peer J. 2023. Vol. 11: e14621. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14621.
12. Effect of sowing dates and varieties on yield and quality performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) / M. Yusuf et al. Agricultural Science Digest. 2019. Vol. 39, Iss. 4. P. 306–310. DOI:10.18805/ag.D-4977.
13. Effects of flour composition, physical dough properties and baking process on hearth loaf properties studied by multivariate statistical methods / E. M. Magnus et al. Journal of Cereal Science. 2000. Vol. 32, Iss. 2. P. 199–212. DOI: 10.1006/jcrs.2000.0325.
14. Genotype by environment interaction and yield stability in sugarcane / R. Rea et al. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín. 2017. Vol. 70 No 2. P. 8129–8138. DOI: 10.15446/rfna.v70n2.61790.
15. Genotype by environment interaction and yield stability of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) genotypes evaluated in western Ethiopia / G. W. Abrha et al. Plant Production Science. 2022. Vol. 25, Iss. 4 P. 467–483. DOI: 10.1080/1343943X.2022.2136722.
16. Grain yield and quality responses of durum wheat (Triticum turgium L. var. durum) to nitrogen and phosphorus rate in Yilmana Densa, Northwestern Ethiopia / A. Assefa et al. Heliyon. 2023. Vol. 9, Iss. 7: e17262. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17262.
17. Grain Quality as Influenced by the Structural Properties of Weed Communities in Mediterranean Wheat Crops / E. H. Plaza et al. Agronomy. 2023. Vol. 13, Iss. 1. P. 49–67. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13010049.
18. Impact of climate change on wheat grain composition and quality / N. Zahra et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2022. Vol. 103, Iss. 6. P. 2745–2751. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.12289.
19. Impact of Fusarium head blight on wheat flour quality: examination of protease activity, technological quality and rheological properties / V. Peršić et al. Agronomy. 2023. Vol. 13, Iss. 3. P. 662–685. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13030662.
20. Impact of sowing date on bread wheat kernel quantitative and qualitative traits under Middle East climate conditions / S. Sasani. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture. 2020. Vol. 107, No 3. P. 279–286. DOI: 10.13080/z-a.2020.107.036.
21. Kaya Y., Sahin M. Non-parametric stability analyses of dough properties in wheat. Food Science and Technology (Campinas). 2015. Vol. 35, Iss. 3. P. 509–515. DOI: 10.1590/1678-457X.6642.
22. Kravchenko M. F., Danyliuk I. P., Romanovska O. L. Technological features of flour composite mixtures. Innovative technologies and equipment: development prospects of the food and restaurant industries : Scientific monograph. Riga, Latvia : Baltija Publishing, 2022. Р. 210–224. DOI https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-205-0-9.
23. Kudriawytzka A. N., Karabach K. S. The influence of fertilizers on yield and quality indicators of spring wheat grain. S World Journal. 2022. Iss. 16-01. P. 131–134. DOI: 10.30888/2663-5712.2022-16-01-021.
24. Marker-assisted selection for transfer of QTLs to a promising line for drought tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) / V. P. Sunilkumar et al. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2023. Vol. 14: 1147200. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1147200.
25. Relationships between structural fat properties with sensory, physical and textural attributes of yeast-leavened laminated salty baked product / A. E. de la Horra et al. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2017. Vol. 54, Iss. 9. P. 2613–2625. DOI: 10.1007/s13197-017-2572-1.
26. Relation between ultrasonic properties, rheology and baking quality for bread doughs of widely differing formulation / D. Peressini et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2017. Vol. 97, Iss. 8. P. 2366–2374. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8048.
27. Starch and dough-related properties of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) exposed to varying temperatures and radiances after anthesis / Z. Zhang et al. Agronomy. 2023. Vol. 13: 1069. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13041069.
28. Tsenov N. Gubatov T. Yanchev I. Effect of genotype-environment interaction on some important quality parameters of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Agricultural Science and Technology. 2023. Vol. 15, Iss. 2. P. 3–16. DOI: 10.15547/ast.2023.02.011.
30. Wheat consumption dynamics in selected countries in Asia and Africa: Implications for wheat supply by 2030 and 2050. Integrated development program discussion paper no. 2. / K. A. Mottaleb et al. El Batan, Texcoco, Mexico : International maize and Wheat Improvement Center CIMMYT. 32 p.
31. Wheat end-use quality: State of art, genetics, genomics-assisted improvement, future challenges, and opportunities / M. Subedi et al. Frontiers in Genetics. 2023. Vol. 13: 1032601. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1032601.
32. Yield and quality of winter durum wheat grain depending on the fertiliser system / Н. Нospodarenko et al. Scientific Horizons. 2022. Vol. 25, No 3. P. 16–25. DOI: 10.48077/scihor.25(3).2022.16-25.
33. Yield stability and relationships among stability parameters in soybean genotypes across years / A. S. Milioli et al. Chilean journal of agricultural research. 2018. Vol. 78 No 2. P. 299–309. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-58392018000200299.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Олександр ДЕМИДОВ, Ірина ПРАВДЗІВА, Надія ВАСИЛЕНКО (Автор)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
