Qualitative and quantitative composition of rumen microbiota and productive qualities of ewe-lamb with the use of bio supplement in the ration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32636/01308521.2022-(72)-1-9Keywords:
ewes-lamb, probiotics, prebiotics, feeding, rumen microbiota, growth intensityAbstract
The effect of different doses of pro- and prebiotic preparations of domestic production made on the basis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast when added to the feeding rations of young sheeps on the qualitative and quantitative composition of rumen microbiota and productive qualities of animals was studied. The experiments were performed on ewes of Askanian meat and wool breeds aged 11–12 months during the winter-spring stall period. The diet of animals of the control group consisted of meadow hay and standard feed K 83-19-89. Animals of the experimental groups in the composition of feed received pro- and prebiotic drugs produced by PJSC "Enzyme Company" (Lviv).
It was found that the use of probiotic "Enzymactiv" (EA) in the composition of young ewes' feed in doses of 0.4; 0.8 and 1.2% and prebiotic "Inactivated dry glutathione yeast" (ISGD) in the amount of 1.0; 1.4 and 1.8% of feed mass has an activating effect on the reproduction of symbiotic rumenal microorganisms such as bacteria, ciliates and microscopic fungi, as well as stimulates the growth and development of animals.
The addition of probiotic EA in these doses to the feed of young ewes increases the total number of microbes in the ewes' rumenal fluid by 6.9–48.3%; the number of ciliates – by 5.7–30.2%; the number of microscopic fungi – by 51.6–100.0%. The use of prebiotic ISGD in the feed compound of animals in the studied doses increases the number of bacteria and fungi in the rumenal content by 41.4–96.6 and 70.8–109.7% and reduces the number of cicatricial ciliates by 1.9–12.8%.
The introduction of probiotic EA to feed in the studied doses increases the gross gain of live weight of animals during the experimental period by 15–35%, and relative – by 14–32%, while the use of prebiotic ISGD in the diet increases these productivity indicators by 30–55 and 27–50%.
Based on the results of experimental studies to stimulate the reproduction of cicatricial microbiota and the intensity of animal growth, it is recommended to add from the weight of feed for young sheep in the winter-spring stall period 0.8% probiotic EA or 1.4% prebiotic ISGD
References
1. A new synbiotic consisting of Lactobacillus casei subsp. casei and dextran improves milk production in Holstein dairy cows / K. Yosuda, S. Hashikawa, H. Sakamoto et al. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2007. Vol. 69 (2). P. 205–208. DOI: 10.1292/jvms.69.2205.
2. Вовк С. О., Польовий І. В. Науково-практичні аспекти використання пребіотиків у годівлі жуйних тварин. Науковий вісник Львівського НАУ ветеринарної медицини та біотехнологій ім. С. З. Гжицького. 2020. Т. 22. № 92. С. 9–14.
3. Ібатуллін І. І., Бащенкко М. І., Жукорський О. М. Довідник з повноцінної годівлі сільськогоспо¬дарських тварин. Київ : Аграрна наука, 2016. 300 с.
4. Коцюмбас І. Я., Жила М. І., Шкіль М. І. Пробіотики – необхідна складова при сучасних технологіях вирощування тварин. Науковий вісник ЛНУВМБТ ім. С. З. Гжицького. 2013. Вип. 3 (57). С. 147–181.
5. Мазуренко М. О. Пробіотичні препарати у тваринництві : монографія. Вінниця, 2011. 68 с.
6. Пробіотики у годівлі тварин і птиці / С. О. Вовк, А. І. Дмитроца, І. В. Польовий, В. М. Бучинський. Передгірне та гірське землеробство і тваринництво. 2021. № 69. С. 157–168.
7. Ashraf R., Shah N. R. Immune system stimulation by probiotic microorganisms. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014. Vol. 54 (7). P. 938–956.
8. Bakowski M., Kiczorowska B. Probiotic microorganisms and herbs in ruminant nutrition as natural modurators of health and production efficiency – A rewiew. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2021. Vol. 21. Is. 1. P. 3–28. URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2020-0081.
9. Beta-glucans improve growth, viability and colonization of probiotic microorganisms / P. Russo, P. López, V. Capozzi et al. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012. Vol. 13 (5). P. 6026–6032. DOI: 10.3390/ijms13056026.
10. Dekker J. Probiotics revisited: new strains, new benefits, new opportunities. Pediatric Pharmacology. 2012. Vol. 9 (2). P. 40–45.
11. Effect of cellooligosaccharide or synbiotic feeding on growth performance, fecal condition and hormone concentrations in holstein calves / T. Hasunuma, K. Kawashima, H. Nakayama et al. J. Anim. Sci. 2016. Vol. 82 (4). P. 543–548. DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2010.00861.x.
12. Effect of concentrate level and live yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) supplementation on Texel lamb performance and carcass characteristics / J. Issakowicz, S. Bueno, A. C. Sampaio, K. M. Duarte. Livest Sci. 2013. Vol. 155 (1). P. 44–52.
13. Effect of live Saccharomyces cerevisiae (NCDC-49) supplementation on growth performance and rumen fermentation pattern in local goat / R. Kamal, T. Dutt, M. Singh et al. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2013. Vol. 41 (3). P. 285–288. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2013.782865.
14. Effects of dietary live yeast culture on fattening performance on some blood and rumen fluid parameters in goats / B. Ozsoy, S. Yalcin, Z. Erodogan et al. Rev. Veter. Med. 2013. Vol. 164 (5). P. 263–271.
15. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation and anhydrous ammonia treatment of wheat straw on in situ degradability and rumen fermentation and growth performance of yearling lambs / M. Comert, Y. Şayan, H. Özelçam, G. Y. Baykal. Asian-Austral J. Anim Sci. 2015. Vol. 28 (5). Р. 639–646. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.14.0757.
16. Effects of short-chain fructooligosaccharides on growth performance of preruminant veal calves / E. Grand, F. Respondek, C. Martineau et al. J. Dairy Sci. 2013. Vol. 96 (2). P. 1094–1099. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4949.
17. Effects of the prebiotics inulin and lactulose on intestinal immunology and hematology of preruminant calves / S. Masanetz, W. Preißinger, H. Meyerand, M. Pfaffl. Animal Sci. 2011. Vol. 5 (7). P. 1099–1106. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731110002521.
18. Feed additives in the diet of high production dairy cows / D. Radzikowski, A. Milczarek, A. Janocha et al. Acta Sci. Pol. Zootechnica. 2020. Vol. 19 (4). P. 5–16.
19. Ghosh S., Mehla R. K. Influence of dietary supplementation of prebiotics (mannanooligosaccharide) on the performance of crossbred calves. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2012. Vol. 44. P. 617–622. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-011-9944-8.
20. Hamasalim H. Synbiotic as feed additives relating to animal health and performance. Advances in Microbiology. 2016. Vol. 6. P. 288–302.
21. Icy D. Recombinant technology and probiotics. International J. Engineering and Technology. 2011. Vol. 3. P. 288–293.
22. Markowiak P., Slizewska K. The role of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in animal nutrition. Gut Pathogens. 2018. Vol. 10 (21). P. 2–20.
23. Meta-analysis of the influence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on ruminal parameters and milk production of ruminants / M. Desnoyer, S. Giger-Reverdin, G. Bertin et al. J. Dairy. Sci. 2009. Vol. 92 (4). P. 1620–1632
24. Selected Alternative Feed Additives Used to Manipulate the Rumen Microbiome / M. Michalak, K. Wojnarowski, P. Cholewinska et al. Animals. 2021. Vol. 11. P. 1542–1552. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061542/animals.2021.05.025.
25. Sethy K., Dhaigude V., Duibedi B. Prebiotics in animal feeding. The Pharma Innovation J. 2017. Vol. 6 (11). P. 482–486.
26. Singh A., Kerketta S., Yogi R. Prebiotics – The New Feed Supplement for Dairy Calf. International Journal of Livestock Research. 2017. Vol. 7 (8). P. 1–17. DOI: 10.5455/ijlr.20170610051314.
27. Sundus F. M., Firas A. M., Enas R. A. A review on effects of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additives in ruminants performance. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 2018. Vol. 6 2). P. 629–635.
28. The effets of single or combined supplementation of probiotics and prebiotics on growth performance, dietary energetics, carcass traits, and visceral mass in lambs finished under subtropical climate conditions / A. Estrada-Angulo, O. Zapata-Ramirez, B. I. Castro-Perez et al. Biology. 2021. Vol. 10. P. 2–13. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/biology101111137.
29. Uyeno Y., Shigemori S., Shimosato T. Effect of Probiotics / Prebiotics on Cattle Health and Productivity. Microbes Environ. 2015. Vol. 30 (2). P. 126–132. DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.ME14176.
30. Watzl B., Girrbach S., Roller M. Inulin, oligofructose and immunomodulation. Brit. J. Nutr. 2005. Vol. 93 (1). P. 49–55. DOI: 10.1079/bjn20041357.
31. Wójcik R., Trapkowska S., Małaczewska J. Influence of ß-1,31,6-D-glucan on non-specific cellular defence mechanisms in lambs. Med. Vet. 2007. Vol. 63 (1). P. 84–86.
32. Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and its effect on production indices of livestock and poultry – a review / I. P. Ogbuewu, V. M. Okoro, E. F. Mbajiorgu, C. A. Mbajiorgu. Comp. Clin. Pathol. 2018. Vol. 28. P. 669–677. DOI: 10.1007/s00580-018-2862-7.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 І. В. ПОЛЬОВИЙ (Автор)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
