Simulation of growth dynamics of meat and egg chickens

Authors

  • Victor Khvostyk Sumy National Agrarian University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32636/01308521.2022-(72)-1-11

Keywords:

meat and egg hens, live weight, forecast, B. Gompertz model, T. Bridges model, F. Richards model

Abstract

The paper presents the results of research on the application of mathematical modeling of polygenically determined trait "live weight" on a wide range of genetic material of chickens. They were the original related forms of meat and egg chickens of domestic selection, descendants of the first and second generations and the improved synthetic population. Live weight of chickens was determined at the daily and 2-, 4-, 6-, 8-, 10-week-old age. Models of B. Gompertz, T. Bridges and
F. Richards were used to predict the live weight of birds. The actual values of live weight were compared with the predicted ones and the deviations between them in percent were calculated. Live weight prediction was performed at 8 and 10 weeks of age in chickens based on actual values for the first 6 weeks of rearing. When using the model of B. Gompertz in meat and egg hens F10 local subpopulation "K", the offspring of F1 showed an overestimation of live weight at the age of 8 and 10 weeks. The highest percentage of exceeding the predicted values over the actual ones was found in "Ross" chickens of the "K-2" group. In birds of other studied groups, this model also slightly overestimated the value of live weight at 8 weeks of age (by 3.79–9.62%). However, at the age of 10 weeks, this model, on the contrary, significantly underestimated the predicted live weight by 11.27–17.88%. In general, according to the model of B. Gompertz, the average percentage deviation of the actually obtained indicators of live weight and theoretically calculated in chickens of the studied groups was at the level of 3.60–7.93%. The most similar correspondence between empirical and predicted values of live weight was observed in meat and egg hens of the improved subpopulation "K-5". According to the model of T. Bridges, in most of the studied groups of chickens at 8 weeks of age there is an overestimation of live weight by 1.84–12.13%, especially in meat and egg chickens F10 subpopulation "K" and descendants of F1 group "K-2". In birds of groups "K-32" and "K-5", this model, on the contrary, slightly underestimated the value of live weight – by 1.50–3.02%. At the age of 10 weeks, T. Bridges’ model in hens of all groups underestimates the live weight in the range of 1.58-20.40%, especially in meat-and-egg hens F11 and offspring F2. In general, the average percentage of deviations of the actually obtained indicators of live weight and theoretically calculated according to this model was 2.81–7.15%. In meat-egg hens F10 of the original maternal form, offspring of F1 and group "K-5" the average percentage of deviations did not exceed 5.0%, which indicates a good correspondence of the actual live weight with the theoretically calculated. F. Richards’ model, like previous models, in chickens of most groups overestimated the predicted live weight at the age of 8 weeks - in the range of 2.86–15.96%. Whereas, in birds of groups "K-32" and "K-5", on the contrary, this model slightly reduced the value of live weight – respectively by 2.71% and 3.17%. F. Richards’ model in chickens of groups "K" (F10), "K-2" and "K-5" slightly overestimated the value of live weight at 10 weeks of age – by 0.44-4.30%. At the same time, in birds of other groups, on the contrary, it underestimated the live weight at this age by 0.63–17.28%, especially in birds of groups "K" (F11) and "K-32". The average percentage of deviations of empirical values calculated by this model was 2.44–6.36%. The greatest coincidence of the actual indicators with the calculated ones was found in the descendants of F1 group "K-1". The coefficients of determination in the models used in the prediction of live weight were high, with maximum values in chickens of the synthetic group "K-5".

References

1. Бондаренко Ю. В., Хвостик В. П. Покращення продуктивності м’ясо-яєчних курей вітчизняної селекції. Вісник СНАУ. Серія: Тваринництво. 2020. Вип. 2 (41). С. 29–32.

2. Ведмеденко О. В., Карпенко О. В. Моделювання і прогнозування живої маси курей коричневих кросів яєчного напряму продуктивності. Таврійський науковий вісник. 2012. Вип. 78. Ч. 2. Т. 1. С. 24–27.

3. Григоренко В. В., Щербина О. В. Математичний підхід в оцінці продуктивних якостей птиці. Актуальні питання сучасної науки : матеріали конфер. (м. Івано-Франківськ, 7–8 липня 2017 р.). Івано-Франківськ, 2017. С. 98–100.

4. Коваленко В. П., Нежлукченко Т. І., Плоткін С. Я. Сучасні методи оцінки і прогнозування закономірностей онто¬генезу тварин і птиці. Вісник аграрної науки. 2008. № 2. С. 40–45.

5. Коваленко І. І. Використання математичних моделей для оцінки параметрів росту птиці різних класів розподілу. Таврійський науковий вісник. 2003. Вип. 22. С. 96–99.

6. Лещишин І. С., Кирилів Я. І. Забійні якості молодняку качок пекінської породи та кросу Черрі-Веллі при вирощуванні з використанням БАД Активіо. Передгірне та гірське землеробство і тваринництво. 2021. Вип. 69. Ч. 2. С. 165–179. DOI: 10.32636/01308521.2021-(69)-2-11.

7. Панькова С. М., Гавілей О. В., Полякова Л. Л. Вплив живої маси та її однорідності до початку фотостимуляції на рівень яєчної продуктивності курей. Вісник аграрної науки. 2022. № 1. С. 33–40. DOI: 10.31073/agrovisnyk202210-05.

8. Степаненко Н. В. Дослідження показників ефективності виробництва яєць за допомогою математичних методів та моделей. Таврійський науковий вісник. Серія: Економіка. 2020. Вип. 2. С. 303–312.

9. Степаненко Н. В. Математичні методи, моделі та інформаційні технології в економіці. Бізнес-навігатор. 2018.Вип. 4 (47). С. 189–194.

10. Степаненко Н. В. Моделювання і прогнозування живої маси птиці яєчних кросів. Таврійський науковий вісник. 2002. Вип. 21. С. 220–224.

11. Ткаченко Р. П., Рибаченко А. В. Математична модель виробництва яєць на промисловій основі. Наукові записки КНТУ. 2011. Вип. 11. Ч. ІІІ. С. 133–138.

12. Щербина О. В. Ефективність диференційного утримання птиці в умовах півдня України. Вісник Дніпропетровського державного аграрно-економічного університету. 2017. № 1 (43). С. 111–117.

13. Bridges Т. C., Turner L. W., Smith E. M. A mathematical procedure for estimating animal growth and body composition. Trans. ASAE. 1986. Vol. 29. No. 5. P. 1342–1347.

14. Edeh H. O., Osita C. O.,Nwoga C. C. The effect of bodyweight variation on laying performances of Shaver brown hen in humid tropical environment. Nigerian J. Anim. Sci. 2020. Vol. 22. Is. 1. P. 83–90.

15. Faridi A., Mottaghitalab M., Rezaee F. Narushin-Takma models as flexible alternatives for describing economic traits in broiler breeder flocks. Poultry Sci. 2011. Vol. 90. Р. 507–515.

16. Ferreira N. T., Nilva K., Sakomura N. K. Modelling the egg components and laying patterns of broiler breeder hens. Animal Production Science. 2015. Vol. 78. № 10. Р. 342–360.

17. Gompertz B. On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and a new mode of determining the value of live contingencies. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. 1825. Vol. 182. P. 513–585.

18. Gous R. M. Simulation modeling for predicting responses in broiler breeder and laying hens. 2012. XXIV World’s Poultry Congress, Brazil. 2012. Р. 1–8.

19. Javid I., Sohai H. K., Nasir M. Effects of egg size (weight) and age on hatching performance and chick quality of broiler breeder. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2016. Vol. 44. P. 354–364.

20. Leksrisompong N., Romero-Sanchez H., Oviedo-Rondón E. O. Effects of feeder space allocations during rearing, female strain, and feed increase rate from photo stimulation to peak egg production on broiler breeder female performance. Poultry Sci. 2014. Vol. 93. P. 1045–1052.

21. Milisits G., Szentirmai E., Donko T. Effect of initial body weigth and body composition of Tetra SL laying hens on the changes in their liveweight, body fat content, egg production and egg composition during the first egg-laying period. Acta Agraria Kaposvariensis. 2016. Vol. 20. Is. 1. P. 27–35.

22. Narinc D., Karaman E., Aksoy T. Investigation of nonlinear models to describe long-term egg production in Japanese quail. Poultry Sci. 2013. Vol. 92. P. 1676–1682.

23. Narinc D., Karaman E., Firat Z. M. Comparison of non-linear growth models to describe the growth in Japanese quail. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2011. Vol. 14. P. 1961–1966.

24. Narinc D., Uckardes F., Aslan E. Egg production curve analysis in poultry science. World Poultry Sci. J. 2014. Vol. 70. P. 817–828.

25. Nonis M. K., Gous R. M. Modelling changes in the components of eggs from broiler breeders over time. Br. Poultry Sci. 2013. Vol. 54. P. 603–610.

26. Otwinowska-Mindur A., Gumuł-ka M., Kania-Gierdziewicz J. Mathematical models for egg production in broiler breeder hens. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2016. Vol. 16. No. 4. Р. 1185–1198. DOI: 10.1515/aoas-2016-0037.

27. Richards F. J. A flexible growth function for empirical use. Journal of experimental Botany. 1959. Vol. 10. P. 290–300.

28. Tumova E., Gous R. M., Tyler N. Effect of hen age, environmental temperature, and oviposition time on egg shell quality and egg shell and serum mineral contents in laying and broiler breeder hens. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2014. Vol. 59. P. 435–443.

29. Wencek E., Kałużna I., Koźlecka M. Performance assessment of the utilitarian and breeding values of meat-type hens. The results of the assessment of the utilitarian value of poultry in 2014 (in Polish). The National Poultry Council – Chamber of Commerce, Warsaw 2015. P. 1243–1387.

30. Wolc A., Graczyk M., Settar P. Modified Wilmink curve for egg production analysis in layers. XXVII International Poultry Science Symposium PB WPSA “Science to practice – practice to science», Bydgoszcz, Poland, 2015. P. 56.

Published

2022-09-29

Issue

Section

STOCKBREEDING

How to Cite

Victor Khvostyk. (2022). Simulation of growth dynamics of meat and egg chickens. Foothill and Mountain Agriculture and Stockbreeding, 72(1), 161-175. https://doi.org/10.32636/01308521.2022-(72)-1-11

Similar Articles

1-10 of 126

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.