Qualitative and quantitative changes in the rumen microbiota in lactating ewe and the growth intensity of sucking lambs under the nutrition effect of yeast bioadditives

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32636/01308521.2024-(76)-2-12

Keywords:

lactating ewes, suckling lambs, baker's yeast, probiotics, prebiotics, rumen microbiota, animal productivity

Abstract

The article presents the results of research of the metabolic and productive effects of domestically produced pro- and prebiotic preparations, made on the basis of Saccharomuces cerevisiae baker's yeast by using them as additives in the feed rations of lactating ewes.

The research was carried out in the conditions of the sheep farm of the State Research Farm "Grusyatichi" (Carpathian foothills zone) and the department of small animal husbandry of the Institute of Agriculture of the Carpathian Region of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine on 7 groups of lactating ewes of the Askanian meat-wool breed with crossbred wool, 5 heads in each group, selected according to the principle of analogues in the 2-month winter-spring stall period (February ‒ March). The main daily feeding ration of the ewes of control group consisted of meadow grass hay (1.5 kg) and standard compound feed K 83-19-89 (0.7 kg), which provided the animals' need for nutrients, macro- and microelements in accordance with domestic feeding standards Animals had free access to drinking water.At the end of the experimental period, after the morning feeding, from 3 ewes of each of the experimental groups, with the help of an oroesophageal probe, rumen fluid was collected, in which the numerical composition of microbes, ciliates and microscopic fungi and the amylolytic, proteolytic and cellulolytic enzymatic activity of the microbiota were determined. Evaluation of the productive qualities of lambs born by ewes was carried out by determining the average growth of their live weight during the period from birth to weaning.

The conducted studies established that the probiotic preparation Enzymactiv (EA), introduced in quantities of 0.4; 0.8 and 1.2 % and the prebiotic preparation Inactivated dry glutathione yeast (IDGY), added in doses of 1.0; 1.4 and 1.8 % of the mass of compound feed stimulates the reproduction and vital activity of ruminal microbiota, their enzymatic activity and increases the intensity of growth of suckling lambs. The most pronounced stimulating effect on the qualitative and quantitative composition of the rumen microbiota, its metabolic activity in lactating ewes and the growth and development of lambs obtained from them is revealed by 0.8 % EA probiotic and IDGY prebiotic in quantity of 1.4 % respectively from weight of combined fodder.

Keywords: lactating ewes, suckling lambs, baker's yeast, probiotics, prebiotics, rumen microbiota, animal productivity.

References

1. Лабораторні методи досліджень у біології, тваринництві та ветеринарній медицині : довідник / за ред. В. В. Влізла. Львів : СПОЛОМ, 2012. 762 с.

2. Петровська І. Р., Салига Ю. Т., Вудмаска І. В. Статистичні методи у біологічних дослідженнях : навч.-метод. посіб. Київ : Аграрна наука, 2022. 172 с.

3. Application of Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii in food processing: A review / M. A. Lazo-Velez et al. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018. 125. P. 943–951.

4. A review on effects of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additives in ruminants performance / F. Sundus et al. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 2018. 6 (2). P. 629–635. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10675.37926.

5. Arowolo M. A., He J. Use of probiotics and botanical extracts to improve ruminant production in the tropics: A review. Anim. Nutr. 2018. Vol. 4, issue 3. P. 241–249.

6. Burdick Sanchez N. C., Broadway P. R., Carroll J. A. Influence of Yeast Products on Modulating Metabolism and Immunity in Cattle and Swine. Animals. 2021. Vol. 11, issue 2. P. 371‒379. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020371.

7. Del Valle J. C., Bonadero M. C., Fernández-Gimenez A. V. Saccharomyces cerevisiae as probiotic, prebiotic, synbiotic, postbiotics and parabiotics in aquaculture: An overview. Aquaculture. 2023. 15. P. 569‒577.

8. Dietary supplementation of yeast cell wall improves the gastrointestinal development of weaned calves / J. Ma et al. Anim. Nutr. 2020. Vol. 6, issue 4. P. 507–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2020.06.003.

9. Effect of cell wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the expression of SBD-1 in cultured ruminal epithelial cells of sheep / Q. Z. Tian et al. Acta Vet. et Zootech. Sin. 2018. 49. P. 927–934.

10. Effect of live yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) supplementation on rumen fermentation and metabolic profile of dairy cows in early lactation / D. Kumprechtova et al. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2019. Vol. 103, issue 2. P. 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13048.

11. Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on nutrient digestibility, rumen fermentation and plasma biochemical parameters of Xiangzhong Black beef / L. Chen et al. J. Anim. Nutr. 2017. 29. P. 3359–3365.

12. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on performance, nutrient apparent digestibility and serum indices of lactating dairy cows / D. N. Zhou et al. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2018. 30. P. 2741–2748.

13. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products on performance and rumen fermentation and microbiota in dairy cows fed a diet containing low quality forage / W. Zhu et al. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2017. 8. P. 36‒49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-017-0167-3.

14. Effects of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Fermentation Products on the Microbial Community throughout the Gastrointestinal Tract of Calves / J. X. Xiao et al. Animals. 2019. Vol. 9, issue 1. P. 4‒15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9010004.

15. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on growth performance, plasma metabolites and hormones, and rumen fermentation in Holstein calves during pre- and post-weaning periods / K. Takemura et al. Anim. Sci. J. 2020. Vol. 91, issue 1. e13402-13412. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13402.

16. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on milk production, insulin sensitivity and immune response in transition dairy cows during hot season / A. H. Nasiri et al. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2019. 251. P. 112–123. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0377840118312033.

17. Effects of yeast mannan oligosaccharides on Growth performance, serum immune and inflammatory indices and Antioxidant indices of Mongolian sheep / M. X. Xie et al. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2018. 30. P. 219–226.

18. Isolation and Characterization of Yeasts from Rumen Fluids for Potential Use as Additives in Ruminant Feeding / C. Suntara et al. Vet. Sci. 2021. Vol. 8, issue 3. P. 52‒59. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8030052.

19. Markowiak P., Śliżewska K. The role of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in animal nutrition. Gut Pathog. 2018. 10 (1). P. 21‒35.

20. Prebiotics and Probiotics in Feed and Animal Htalth / A. Anadon et al. Nutraceuticals in Veterinary Medicine. Springer, Cham, 2019. P. 261–285. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333302838_Prebiotics_and_Probiotics_in_Feed_and_Animal_Health.

21. Productive and Reproductive Performances of Primi-parous Friesian Cows Treated with Yeast Culture / W. Wafa et al. J. Anim. Poult. Prod. 2020. 11. P. 331–337. https://doi.org/10.21608/jappmu.2020.118216.

22. Prospect of yeast probiotic inclusion enhances livestock feeds utilization and performance: An overview / M. M. Elghandour et al. Biomass. Convers. Bior. 2022. P. 1–13.

23. Research progress on application of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in animal production / D. Bin et al. Feed Res. 2019. 7. P. 114–116.

24. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Hanseniaspora osmophila strains as yeast active cultures for potential probiotic applications / P. Fernandes-Pacheco et al. Food Funct. 2019. 10. P. 4924–4931.

25. Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii CNCM I-1079 affects health, growth, and fecal microbiota in milk-fed veal calves / C. Villot et al. J. Dairy Sci. 2019. 102. P. 7011–7025. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-16149.

26. Scientific and practical aspects of the use of pro-, pre- and synbiotics in the feeding of ruminants againts the backgraund of recearch conducted in Ukraine / S. Vovk et al. Acta Sci. Pol. Zootechnica. 2022. (21) 4. P. 5–16. https://doi.org/10.21005/asp.2022.21.4.01.

27. Shurson G. C. Yeast and yeast derivatives in feed additives and ingredients: Sources, characteristics, animal responses, and quantification methods. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2018. Vol. 235. P. 60–76.

28. Singhal B., Chaudhary N. Metabiotics as functional metabolites of probiotics: An emerging concept and its potential application in food and health. Biotechnical Processing in the Food Industry. Apple Academic Press, 2021. P. 207–236.

29. Staniszewski A., Kordowska-Wiater M. Probiotic and Potentially Probiotic Yeasts ‒ Characteristics and Food Application. Foods. 2021. Vol. 10, issue 6. P. 1306‒1315. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10061306.

30. Supplementing a yeast probiotic to pre-weaning Holstein calves: Feed intake, growth and fecal biomarkers of gut health / Z. X. He et al. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2017. 226. P. 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.02.010.

31. The use of probiotics in animal feeding for safe production and as potential alternatives to antibiotics / M. J. Mbarga et al. Vet. World. 2021. 14 (2). P. 319–328.

32. Yeast cell wall supplementation alters the performance and health of beef heifers during the receiving period / T. R. Young et al. Prof. Anim. Sci. 2017. Vol. 33, issue 2. P. 166–175. https://doi.org/10.15232/pas.2016-01511.

33. Yeast Probiotic and Yeast Products in Enhancing Livestock Feeds Utilization and Performance: An Overview / Y. Pang et al. J. Fungi. 2022. Vol. 8, issue 11. P. 1191‒1203. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8111191.

Published

2024-12-30

Issue

Section

STOCKBREEDING

How to Cite

Stakh VOVK, Hryhorii SEDILO, Myron PETRYSHYN, & Ivan POLOVYI. (2024). Qualitative and quantitative changes in the rumen microbiota in lactating ewe and the growth intensity of sucking lambs under the nutrition effect of yeast bioadditives. Foothill and Mountain Agriculture and Stockbreeding, 76(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.32636/01308521.2024-(76)-2-12

Similar Articles

1-10 of 231

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>